Lack of coordination is leaving modern slavery victims and survivors vulnerable, say experts
Researchers at The University of Ò°ÀÇÉçÇø are calling for stronger, coordinated partnerships to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking, warning that gaps between organisations risk leaving victims and survivors without consistent protection and support.
Their appeal comes in a new review commissioned by , which examines how organisations across the city region work together to identify, safeguard and support people affected by modern slavery and human trafficking. The review focuses on partnerships involving local authorities, statutory services, law enforcement, housing providers and voluntary and community sector organisations.
The authors argue that tackling modern slavery depends on robust, long-term collaboration rather than ad hoc arrangements. While organisations across Greater Ò°ÀÇÉçÇø have developed innovative partnership approaches, the review finds that these are not always embedded consistently across the system. Among the review’s key recommendations, the authors are calling for:
- Clearer strategic governance to strengthen modern slavery and human trafficking partnerships at a Greater Ò°ÀÇÉçÇø-wide level.
- More consistent roles and responsibilities across organisations, so victims/survivors do not fall through gaps between services.
- Improved information-sharing and referral pathways, ensuring concerns are acted on quickly and safely.
- Sustainable funding and resources to support partnership working, rather than reliance on short-term arrangements.
- Stronger links between safeguarding, housing, immigration advice and criminal justice responses, reflecting the needs of victims.
The review suggests that where partnerships are well established, outcomes for victims are more likely to be improved. Such embedded collaboration enables earlier identification of exploitation, better safeguarding responses and coordinated support to help individuals recover and rebuild their lives. Strong partnerships also support disruption of criminal activity by improving intelligence-sharing and joint working.
However, the authors highlight challenges which can weaken partnership arrangements including variations in local practice, capacity pressures and funding uncertainty. Frontline professionals reported that without clear structures and shared accountability, collaboration often relies on personal relationships, making it fragile and difficult to sustain.
The researchers also note that victims and survivors of modern slavery often face overlapping vulnerabilities including insecure housing, mental ill-health and immigration insecurity. Without joined-up working across sectors, these complexities can delay support and increase the risk of re-exploitation.
The authors stress that the findings have national relevance due to a relatively cohesive modern slavery partnership approach in Greater Ò°ÀÇÉçÇø. As awareness of modern slavery grows, public bodies across the UK face pressure to demonstrate good quality partnership responses. The review positions Greater Ò°ÀÇÉçÇø as a potential leader, but cautions that this requires investment in governance, coordination and shared learning.
“This review shows that partnership working is not optional when tackling modern slavery and human trafficking - it is essential. The needs of victims and survivors cut across organisational boundaries, and responses must do the same. Our recommendations set out how partners across Greater Ò°ÀÇÉçÇø can strengthen their approach and provide protection and support.